Experiential evidence shows that pain is associated with common meanings. These include a meaning of threat or danger, which is experienced as immediately distressing or unpleasant; cognitive meanings, which are focused on the long-term consequences of having chronic pain; and existential meanings such as hopelessness, which are more about the person with chronic pain than the pain itself. This interdisciplinary book - the second in the three-volume Meanings of Pain series edited by Dr Simon van Rysewyk - aims to better (...) understand pain by describing experiences of pain and the meanings these experiences hold for the people living through them. The lived experiences of pain described here involve various types of chronic pain, including spinal pain, labour pain, rheumatic pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, endometriosis-associated pain, and cancer-related pain. Two chapters provide narrative descriptions of pain, recounted and interpreted by people with pain. Language is important to understanding the meaning of pain since it is the primary tool human beings use to manipulate meaning. As discussed in the book, linguistic meaning may hold clues to understanding some pain-related experiences, including the stigmatisation of people with pain, the dynamics of patient-clinician communication, and other issues, such as relationships between pain, public policy and the law, and attempts to develop a taxonomy of pain that is meaningful for patients. Clinical implications are described in each chapter. This book is intended for people with pain, their family members or caregivers, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy makers. (shrink)

RésuméCet article démontre qu'un exemple cité par Ernest Adams pour montrer que l'implication matérielle n'est pas l'interprétation correcte de la sémantique de la conjonction de subordination si, n'est rien d'autre qu'un corollaire d'une observation d'jà faite par Lewis Carroll, il y a cent ans, dans l'exposition de son paradoxe du salon de coiffure.

En France, jusqu’en 2007, au moins trois albums de bandes dessinées avaient été consacrés à la diffusion du témoignage d’un survivant de la Shoah. Il s’agit des diptyques Maus et Au nom de tous les miens respectivement signés par Art Spiegelman et par le duo Philippe Cothias / Paul Gillon, et de Seules contre tous réalisé par Miriam Katin. Si la mécanique énonciative de Maus a plus d’une fois été mise en relief par les sciences sociales, il n’en est, (...) semble-t-il, rien pour les deux autres oeuvres. En conséquence, la présente contribution expose les caractéristiques de l’énonciation des récits testimoniaux composant celles-ci. Puis, compte tenu de l’inévitable disparition des derniers rescapés du génocide, en s’appuyant sur d’autres albums, cette étude s’interroge aussi sur l’avenir de l’expression du témoignage relatif à la Shoah dans et par la bande dessinée.Up to 2007 in France, at least three comic strip albums had been published to give voice to the personal accounts of survivors of the Holocaust. These were the “Maus” and “Au nom de tous les miens” diptychs by Art Spiegelman and the Philippe Cothias / Paul Gillon duo, and “Seules contre tous” by Miriam Katin. While the enunciative mechanics of “Maus” have been highlighted more than once by the social sciences, this does not seem to be the case for the other two works. Consequently, this contribution describes the enunciative characteristics of the testimonial narratives that compose them. Given that the survivors of the Holocaust will inevitably disappear, we then move on to other albums to seek insights into the future of personal accounts of the Holocaust in and through the comic strip medium. (shrink)